<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About to try Performancing for Firefox</title>
	<link>http://ktn.blogsome.com/2006/01/23/about-to-try-performancing-for-firefox/</link>
	<description>Technology, Web 2.0, Domino, System i, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://ktn.blogsome.com/2006/01/23/about-to-try-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ktn.blogsome.com/2006/01/23/about-to-try-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-8</guid>
					<description>Hey, César! Thanks a bunch for the feedback and for sharing your thoughts about Performancing for FireFox. Indeed, that was one of the reasons why I have tried it out in the first place. To see if I could make use of it for our internal Roller weblogs or not and if we can to see if we could transition into making using of just FireFox for posting content as opposed to have multiple weblogging platforms. We shall see how things will go but I am confident we may be able to get things to work ! Fingers crossed ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, César! Thanks a bunch for the feedback and for sharing your thoughts about Performancing for FireFox. Indeed, that was one of the reasons why I have tried it out in the first place. To see if I could make use of it for our internal Roller weblogs or not and if we can to see if we could transition into making using of just FireFox for posting content as opposed to have multiple weblogging platforms. We shall see how things will go but I am confident we may be able to get things to work ! Fingers crossed !
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
